Penny Nance, Concerned Women for America’s (CWA) CEO & President, was at the White House Rose Garden to witness and celebrate the swearing in of Justice Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court. President Donald J. Trump’s invitation to the solemn occasion is an honor and a true testament of the marvelous work you, our CWA leaders and members, did to support such an honorable candidate.
Justice Gorsuch’s record gives us great hope and confidence that he will perform his duties in a manner worthy of the incredible position he has received. In a moving part of his speech, he acknowledged the Scalia family with these wonderful words: “To the Scalia family, I won’t ever forget that the seat I inherit today is that of a very, very great man.”
He also had some words for us all:
[T]o the American people, I am humbled by the trust placed in me today. I will never forget that to whom much is given, much will be expected. And I promise you that I will do all my powers permit to be a faithful servant of the Constitution and laws of this great nation.
The wisdom Justice Gorsuch cites comes from Scripture (Luke 12) and this is greatly encouraging. That is the wisdom he will need as he takes on the gargantuan challenge before him now.
Concerned Women for America commits to continue to lift Justice Gorsuch in prayer, as we do all of the Justices.
May “God save the United States and th[e] Honorable Court.”
You did it. The U.S. Senate has just confirmed Judge (now Justice) Neil Gorsuch to be the 113th Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court. This is great news for all Americans, whatever their political affiliation.
Justice Gorsuch is the type of judge who will strive for judicial restraint and has demonstrated he respects the Constitution as written. This is all we can hope for in a Justice of the Supreme Court.
He was confirmed by a bipartisan majority 54-45. The 45 voting against him played to their extreme, radical base, but they failed miserably to present any credible evidence that their vote was a sincere reflection of Judge Gorsuch’s record. It was shameful to see them behave in this way.
Still, Justice Gorsuch is on to the Supreme Court and reports tell us he will be ready to tackle the important cases that are set to come before the court this month. Let us continue to keep him and his family in prayer.
A lot of the credit of this nomination has to go to President Donald Trump for keeping his promise and nominating someone in the mold of the late, great Justice Scalia. Also to Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) who led the senate through a flawless process that ultimately got us such a qualified nominee on the court.
Penny Nance, Concerned Women for America’s (CWA) CEO & President, thanked them both on behalf of CWA members around the country in her statement:
On behalf of our members, I want to thank Leader McConnell, as well as Sen. Grassley, for their decisive leadership, which gave the American people a voice in November on the kind of justice they believed should fill the Supreme Court vacancy.
I also want to thank President Trump for keeping his promise to nominate a constitutionalist judge to the Supreme Court. It is hard to imagine someone better suited to serve on our nation’s highest court than Judge Gorsuch.
The 24/7 media cycle made this much more dramatic than it needed to be, but the bottom line is Judge Neil Gorsuch will be confirmed as the next Justice of the Supreme Court.
The radical left was mad about many things (Trump, Garland, etc.), but their objections to Judge Gorsuch never passed the laugh test.
So, as predicted, the majority of the Democrats (though not all) foolishly and unnecessarily decided to deploy the first partisan filibuster in U.S. history. But it was all for nothing, his confirmation will go through to the final vote.
Penny Nance, Concerned Women for America’s CEO & President, said, “The left needs to respect the American peoples’ choice in November and start listening to their constituents instead of special interests.”
The senate, therefore, is scheduled to have the final vote on his nomination on Friday, following the 30 hours of required debate. That will put the vote, sometime around 7:00 p.m. (earlier if Democrats yield back time).
This development also opens the door for Judge Gorsuch to be seated on the court for oral arguments in a couple of weeks (the week of April 17) when some important decisions will be heard, including a very important religious liberty case.
Let us pray for Judge Gorsuch as he prepares to very quickly deal with such important issues.
As Senate Democrats continue their childish pouting over the inevitable confirmation of Judge Neil Gorsuch to the U.S. Supreme Court, a new decision by the Seventh Circuit reminds us why the nomination of Judge Gorsuch is crucial to guarding our liberties for years to come.
Before I tell you more about that decision, I will remind you that today is the day the Senate will go “nuclear.” The vote on the cloture motion will be happening around 11:00 a.m. (EST). And this is where we expect Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell (R-Kentucky) will be forced to deploy the “nuclear” or “constitutional” option that will end the debate with 51 votes, so that we may finally have a vote for confirmation (on Friday after the required 30 hours of debate have passed).
But back to the Seventh Circuit decision that reminds us what’s at stake. I will spare you the details of the case for now (I will write about them in an upcoming post), as they might cloud the most important point.
The point being that the court re-writes a law (the 1964 Civil Rights Act), and it boldly and passionately admits it is doing so — at least one judge, writing a concurring opinion.
Judge Richard Posner’s hubris in some ways should be applauded, for he finally states for all of us to see, what so many other liberal judges deny doing, while they do it. Here is what he wrote (emphasis mine):
I would prefer to see us acknowledge openly that today we, who are judges rather than members of Congress, are imposing on a half-century-old statute a meaning of “sex discrimination” that the Congress that enacted it would not have accepted. This is something courts do fairly frequently to avoid statutory obsolescence and concomitantly to avoid placing the entire burden of updating old statutes on the legislative branch. We should not leave the impression that we are merely the obedient servants of the 88th Congress (1963-1965), carrying out their wishes. We are not. We are taking advantage of what the last half century has taught.
Notice the three highlighted passages.
He admits they are re-writing the law to say something that would not have even passed. Think about that. Not only, Judge Posner argues, does he have the power to re-interpret a statute to “adapt to new situations,” as liberals usually argue, he is saying they can re-write it to say the exact opposite of what Congress intended. After all, they are not “merely obedient servants.”
Part of his reasoning is that poor Congress has too much on its hands, so judges are just alleviating their burden by taking on some of their legislative duties — duties, of course, THAT THE CONSTITUTION NEVER GIVES POWER TO THE COURTS TO PERFORM (yes, I’m yelling).
The “taking advantage” phrase must not be ignored. This is the revelation of an agenda-driven decision and an agenda-driven judge. Laws are sometimes passed in order to bring stability and certainty and, indeed, to avoid the flimsy whims of culture. Judge Posner and other liberal radicals like him stand in stark opposition to that, believing judges can just manipulate any law to say anything they think is good, according to the latest cultural fads. The Constitution is nothing but a joke in the hands of such judges.
Reader, I don’t care if you are a Republican or a Democrat, a conservative or a liberal, we must stand together and reject this dangerous judicial philosophy. It is judicial tyranny.
What is the recourse for “We the People” with the law in the hands of such a judicial despot? To pass new laws, when the judge can make it mean whatever he or she wants?
This is why we need Judge Neil Gorsuch on the Supreme Court. What a contrast! Gorsuch says he will abide by the laws enacted by the people, even when they conflict with his personal policy preferences. Therefore, when we elect people to Congress to enact a law and a law is passed, we can be confident in that law. And if we don’t like what they are doing, we can elect new people to pass the kind of laws we want. That way, the power remains with “We the People,” and not with unelected judicial supremacists.
So, support judges like Gorsuch and reject the “Posners” and their “living, breathing Constitution” that they can manipulate at will.
It might be hard for some to believe, given the continuous drumbeat by the media, but Judge Neil Gorsuch has bipartisan support to be confirmed as the next U.S. Supreme Court Justice.
He, of course, has the full support of Republican senators, but Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Indiana), Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia), and Heidi Heitkamp (D-North Dakota) have also expressed their support of his nomination. In addition, Sen. Michael Bennet (D-Colorado) is not standing with his Democratic colleagues in support of a filibuster, instead committing to vote for cloture. I expect him to ultimately vote for final confirmation as well.
This is a testament to Judge Gorsuch’s incredible credentials. They are simply undisputed by all who have examined his record, including the liberal American Bar Association, which gave him its highest rating for the position, “unanimously, well qualified.”
These facts are enough to see right through the radicalism of the opposition and its media enablers. Judge Gorsuch is objectively a consensus nominee.
The only purely partisan effort surrounding him is the efforts of Democrats crying “uncle” to the radical left’s phony indignation against anything and everything even remotely related to President Trump.
Or are they really accusing their fellow Democrats voting in support of Gorsuch of being part of the “right-wing”?
No, they know Judge Gorsuch does not deserve the treatment they are giving him. They know their Democratic colleagues are doing the reasonable thing. In years past, Judge Gorsuch would have received little opposition. But we live in the times of President Trump, and emotions are running unreasonably high.
The Democrat elite are trying to rebuild the party after President Obama, and it looks like they feel they do not have the strength to withstand the radical left, believing instead they can use their anti-Trump energy to form a sort of “tea party” of the left.
Remember, in 2009, having just won the presidency, Democrats held commanding majorities in both chambers — 55 seats in the Senate and 256 seats in the House. Slowly, they lost the House, the Senate and, ultimately, the presidency.
Bottom line: the left is furious and out for blood.
So you see, opposition to Gorsuch has nothing to do with the nominee and everything to do with political resentment. They’ve been tempted to just lay the blame on the treatment of Judge Garland, but that is just an excuse to justify their actions.
To lay the blame for the judicial appointments wars, one must go way beyond the last year of President Obama, where they conveniently start the narrative to oppose Judge Gorsuch. The discussion includes Sen. Harry Reid abolishing the filibuster in 2013 and names like Miguel Estrada and Robert Bork. But you don’t hear discussion of any of that from Democrats or from their media enablers.
And again, all of it continues to confirm that, despite what their lips are saying about Gorsuch’s record, it is not about him at all. He should be swiftly confirmed.
His filibuster is about appeasing and keeping the radical left energized, blatantly ignoring whether it is the right thing to do for the Senate, the Supreme Court, or the American people in general.
That is why Donnelly, Manchin, and Heitkamp deserve a lot of credit. They represent the type of leaders that we need in the Senate — leaders who are confident enough to stand up to unreasonable pressure from their own side.
Sure, we don’t agree with them on most issues. But they are doing the right thing on this nomination. Their constituents should be pleased with them on this.
You want a leader who responds to pressure, but resists unreasonable pressure. And that is what the opposition against Judge Gorsuch is, unreasonable and extreme.
Judge Gorsuch showed throughout the hearings that he is a man who will abide by the Constitution and the laws as enacted. This means either party can advance their agenda through the proper channels provided by the constitution to do so. This is a win for all Americans, regardless of their political views.
That is why we can all feel confident and proud as we look forward to Justice Gorsuch taking his spot at 1 First Street, NE, Washington, D.C.
It was a painful executive meeting at the Senate Judiciary Committee today where Judge Neil Gorsuch was voted favorably out of committee 11-9 on a straight partisan vote. Democrats struggled to justify voting against such a well-qualified nominee, and they failed miserably.
Penny Nance, CEP & President of Concerned Women for America (CWA), said:
In a time of extreme political dysfunction and gridlock, the confirmation of Judge Gorsuch should be a point of unity. Judge Gorsuch has garnered widespread, bipartisan support for his confirmation due to his character, sharp intellect, jurisprudence, and impartiality. He is the embodiment of an ideal justice – one who is faithful to adhere to the text of the law when making decisions, regardless of his personal or political views.
Judge Gorsuch is now one step closer to making 1 First Street his new permanent office address.
The procedure in the Senate is very simple, despite what you hear from the biased media. Democrats have already confirmed they will try to filibuster Judge Gorsuch, which only means that Sen. McConnell will have to do what Sen. Reid did back in 2013. He will move to use the “nuclear” or “constitutional” option that will simply ensure a nominee can be confirmed by a simple majority, bypassing the 60 votes that were needed to end the debate on a topic before Sen. Reid changed the rules back then.
After that procedural vote to do away with the 60 vote threshold is passed, the Senate will finally vote on the substantive nomination where Judge Gorsuch already enjoys bipartisan support.
Sens. Joe Donnelly (D-Indiana), Heidi Heitkamp (D-North Dakota), and Joe Manchin (D-West Virginia) have already committed to do the honorable thing and vote for Judge Gorsuch. They should be commended, along with all Republican senators who have shown strong support for the nominee all along.
Washington, D.C. –Today, the confirmation hearings for Supreme Court nominee, Judge Neil Gorsuch, will draw to a close.Penny Nance, CEO & President of Concerned Women for America (CWA), the largest public policy organization for women in the country, had this to say on the performance of Judge Neil Gorsuch at his hearings to become the next justice of the U.S. Supreme Court:
“Senate Democrats have tried every way they can to show from Neil Gorsuch’s record one reason to vote against him. But they have come up empty. There is not a single reasonable reason on Judge Gorsuch’s record to vote against him.
“Now, we know many object to President Trump or Steve Bannon or the Republicans’ treatment of Judge Garland, and they will choose the unprecedented, radical position not to vote for Judge Gorsuch as a result. But, looking at his record, he comes out of now his third day of hearings unscathed.
“He has been thoughtful, poised, reasonable, independent, caring, empathetic, and humble. He has shown himself to be beyond all reasonable doubt a mainstream nominee worthy of each and every senator’s vote.
“The thousands of members of Concerned Women for America around the country that I represent are united in asking all senators to put politics aside for once and act in the best interest of our country by voting for Neil Gorsuch’s confirmation.”
For an interview with Penny Nance contact Janae Stracke [email protected] 712-269-1724.
Once again, Judge Neil Gorsuch showed why he is such a stellar choice for the Supreme Court. He was graceful, poised and patient with all members and had prepared a thoughtful opening statement that captivated the audience.
Here are some excerpts:
My Mom was one of the first women graduates of the University of Colorado law school. As the first female assistant district attorney in Denver, she helped start a program to pursue deadbeat dads. And her idea of day care sometimes meant I got to spend the day wandering the halls or tagging behind police officers. She taught me that headlines are fleeting – courage lasts.
My Dad taught me that success in life has little to do with success. Kindness, he showed me, is the great virtue. He showed me too that there are few places closer to God than walking in the wilderness or wading a trout stream. Even if it is an awfully long drive home with the family dog after he encounters a skunk. …
When I put on the robe, I am also reminded that under our Constitution, it is for this body, the people’s representatives, to make new laws. For the executive to ensure those laws are faithfully enforced. And for neutral and independent judges to apply the law in the people’s disputes. If judges were just secret legislators, declaring not what the law is but what they would like it to be, the very idea of a government by the people and for the people would be at risk. And those who came to court would live in fear, never sure exactly what governs them except the judge’s will. As Alexander Hamilton explained, “Liberty can have nothing to fear from” judges who apply the law, but liberty “ha[s] every thing to fear” if judges try to legislate, too. …
As a student many years ago, I found myself walking through the Old Granary burial ground in Boston where Paul Revere, John Hancock, and many of our founders are buried. I came across the tombstone of a lawyer and judge who today is largely forgotten — as we are all destined to be soon enough. His name was Increase Sumner. Written on his tombstone over 200 years ago was this description —
As a lawyer, he was faithful and able;
as a judge, patient, impartial, and decisive;
in private life, he was affectionate and mild;
in public life, he was dignified and firm.
Party feuds were allayed by the correctness of his conduct;
calumny was silenced by the weight of his virtues,
and rancor softened by the amenity of his manners.
These words stick with me. I keep them on my desk. They serve for me as a daily reminder of the law’s integrity, that a useful life can be led in its service, of the hard work it takes, and an encouragement to good habits when I fail and falter. At the end of it all, I could hope for nothing more than to be described as he was. If confirmed, I pledge that I will do everything in my power to be that man.
2)Democrats want to debate Donald Trump’s record, not Gorsuch’s
It started with Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-California) setting the stage, “We are here today under very unusual circumstances.” Because “President Trump repeatedly promised to appoint someone in the mold of Justice Scalia.” The horror!
Someone should have told her speech writer that that was one of the main reasons why President Trump won the election! But I digress.
It continued with almost every other Democratic senator. Here is Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minnesota):
You come before us this afternoon not only as a nominee sitting at a table with your friends and family behind you but in the context of the era in which we live. From the highest level of government, we have heard criticism of journalists. Seventeen intelligent agencies have confirmed that Russia attempted to influence our most recent election. At the same time, voting rights …
She continued to complain about President Trump for a while, until she finally admitted, “You are not the cause of these challenges, Judge.” Then why are you talking about that? Have a hearing on President Trump, if you like. But this will be a recurring theme.
A theme that will ultimately fail, but they’ll push it nonetheless.
3)Sen. Whitehouse should be ashamed of himself
Sure, no one but legal geeks like me pays close attention to Senate Judiciary Committee Members’ statements, but Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s (D- Rhode Island) opening statement should be highlighted and decried (by senators from both parties) as the worst form of partisan chicanery.
He essentially accused conservative justices (and conservative judges in general) of being bought by corporations. You can watch his shameful statement here:
“There is no coincidence here,” he said, “Business has groups trolling for cases to get them before the friendly court. … It’s kind of a machine. They set up and fund front groups, the front groups appear before the court, they tell the court what the special interest wants and the court follows the brief and the decision favors the special interest and they pour more money to the front groups.”
In other words, conservative justices are beholden to big businesses because they give money for them to get them elected and selected. He even insinuated that was the case with Judge Gorsuch. Those same groups, he told Gorsuch looking straight at him, “are spending millions of dollars in a dark money campaign to push your confirmation.”
Gorsuch is a humble, respectful man. And frankly, almost all senators-Republican and Democrats- were at least dignified in their statements, even as they expressed some apprehension to Gorsuch’s nomination. But not Sen. Whitehouse.
He dishonored the Senate and insulted an honorable man to score cheap political points. He should be ashamed of what he did, and he should apologize to his Senate colleagues, the nominee, and the American people.
He, above all, should apologize to Chief Justice Roberts for whom he reserved most contempt.
Sen. Whitehouse’s conspiracy theories are typical of the most fringe groups of the radical left. But for him to bring them into a confirmation hearing as important as this, is simply reprehensible.
We’ve all seen how furious the radical left is about losing the election. I can understand their frustrations. What I can’t understand is their mind-numbing push to denigrate anyone and anything even remotely associated with President Donald Trump, ignoring the particular merits of every situation.
President Trump’s nominee for the Supreme Court, Judge Neil Gorsuch, is the perfect example. By all accounts, this is a judge of impeccable character with the highest of qualifications. And he is being opposed by some in the Democratic leadership because of Trump.