Category

Sanctity of Life

Use Your Voice – Episode 12, Abortion and Eugenics

By | Blog, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life, Use Your Voice | No Comments

In this episode, Mario Diaz, Esq., Concerned Women for America’s (CWA) General Counsel, discusses a recent Supreme Court decision where Justice Clarence Thomas exposes the clear connection between abortion and eugenics. He said, “Abortion is an act rife with the potential for eugenic manipulation.”

The case is Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentuckyand you won’t want to miss our discussion of its potential impact and what it means for the protection of the unborn.

 

Your Help is Needed: Conscience Care Rule — Action Center

By | Blog, LAC Hot Topics/Alerts, News and Events, Religious Liberty, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Earlier this week, we had a huge victory surrounding the Title X program and a finalized rule we asked for your help generating comments on last summer. Yet again, we have the opportunity to back up the good work that President Trump is doing through the official rulemaking process.

Last month, the Department of Health and Human Services issued a proposed rule surrounding section 1557 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). This rule rolls back previous action taken by President Obama that wrongfully interpreted the word “sex” to include “gender identity” and “termination of pregnancy” and prohibited so-called discrimination against these classes. This means that doctors who do not want to perform gender transition treatments would be forced to and doctors who don’t want to participate in abortions would be forced to participate, even if they have objections on moral or religious grounds.

This new rule clarifies that Section 1557 of the ACA cannot force a recipient of federal funding to provide or pay for an abortion. It will also be consistent with the First Amendment, the intent and language of civil rights laws, and consistent with pro-life provisions, conscience provisions, and religious liberty protections in current law. This rule is a timely clarification that the federal definition of sex discrimination in the ACA does not include abortion or gender transition treatments and thus aligns with existing civil rights laws. For many healthcare providers, performing abortions or gender transition treatments is a violation of conscience and sound medical practice.

We need your help commenting on this proposed rule so that it will move forward. You may remember that these proposed rules go through a public comment period, and then the issuing agency has to take public comments into account crafting a final rule. President Trump needs you to submit a comment praising this rule. Although these Obama-era rules never went into effect, HHS needs to uphold the biological definition of sex in civil rights laws. This proposed rule is now open for a public comment period that will close on August 13, 2019. After the comment period closes, HHS must then review each comment and issue a final ruling based on feedback. Therefore, our voice on this matter is crucial.

Not sure what to say? We’ve made it easy for you! Click here to be taken to a page where we further explain what this rule is, provide a sample comment, and a place for personalization. You can submit an official comment with just one click!

Please join us and use your voice to tell President Trump to continue to protect religious liberty!

Concerned Women for America Celebrates Long-Overdue Enforcement of Life-Affirming Title X Rules

By | Blog, Feminist / Women's Issues, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Press Releases, Sanctity of Life, Social / Cultural Issues | No Comments

 

Washington, D.C. – Earlier this week, the Trump Administration announced that restrictions over abortion-referrals and over clinics receiving federal funding will take effect and be enforced by Health and Human Services (HHS). Family planning clinics will no longer be allowed to provide abortion referrals and must be financially separate from any provision of abortion procedures. HHS is now finally free to carry out the will of the people who overwhelmingly support a clear separation between taxpayer dollars and abortion advocacy.

Penny Nance, CEO and President of Concerned Women for America (CWA), the largest public policy organization for women in the country had this to say:

“This is a day to celebrate life-affirming policies and the rule of law. For way too long, abortion advocates have relied on activist judges to carry out their bidding, despite the many situations when the letter of the law clearly expressed the American people’s desire to promote the intrinsic value and respect of every human life. They tried that in this case again and delayed the implementation of these common sense rules through misplaced and overreaching nationwide injunctions that prevented HHS from doing its job. But they have failed. And failed even in one of the most liberal courts in the land, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals.

“President Donald J. Trump’s unwavering commitment to the protection of human life and his focus on constitutional judges who follow the law, instead of promoting personal policy preferences through judicial opinions, shines brightly as we contemplate this victory.

“The consensus-building principle of prohibiting taxpayer funded abortion has enjoyed overwhelming bi-partisan support over the years. But abortion advocates continue to grow increasingly radical in their positions, and liberals in Congress have sadly fallen right in line with the idea of forcing Americans to pay for abortion-related services, even when they have moral, religious or philosophical objections to it.

“Conservative women all over the country are grateful to the President for his leadership and applaud the men and women of HHS for their steady commitment to the enforcement of these rules to ensure statutory compliance with the law.”

 

 

Click here to see Penny Nance’s Statement on the death of Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens.

Penny Nance: Down syndrome children live full, beautiful lives — They don’t deserve to be aborted

By | Blog, CEO, Family Issues, News and Events, Sanctity of Life, Social / Cultural Issues | No Comments

Concerned Women for America CEO and President, Penny Nance wrote the following opinion piece featured on FoxNews.com in response to a recent story out of the United Kingdom. The story is about a mother who is suing the hospital four years after the birth of her son, saying she would have aborted him if she had been informed of his disability.

“At just 23-years of age, John Cronin recently won the “EY Entrepreneur of the Year” award for his co-founding of the company, “John’s Crazy Socks.” After his award, he appeared on numerous television shows and was featured in online news stories telling the world he is an “entrepreneur, a philanthropist, and a businessman.”

Sujeet Desai is a musician who plays seven instruments including the violin, piano, trumpet, and saxophone. He has been featured in several national publications and has received numerous awards for his work.

John and Sujeet both have Down syndrome. They are successful, happy, and productive, and they bring incredible joy to their family and friends. They are shining examples of the value a person living with this disability can bring to the world.

In a story out of the United Kingdom last week, we learned that the mother of a 4-year-old little boy with Down syndrome is suing her doctors telling the world she would certainly have aborted her child had her doctors informed her he had Down syndrome.”

Click here to read the entire article.

Click here to read Penny Nance’s previous opinion article.

For Liberal CEOs, Abortion is Good For Business

By | Commentary, Defense of Family, News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

CWA’s Senior Director of Government Relations, Doreen Denny, penned the following opinion piece featured on The Daily Signal:

“As more states pass restrictions on abortion, companies are coming out of the woodwork to oppose them.

Recently, some 180 companies “employing more than 108,000 workers” purchased a full-page ad in The New York Times under the banner “Don’t Ban Equality: It’s time for companies to stand up for reproductive health care.”

Translation: It’s time for businesses to defend abortion.

Many of these companies aren’t typically considered far-left organizations. Exactly what message are they sending to women by spending ad dollars to promote abortion? Are they saying babies are bad for business?

A closer look at these companies may help to unmask what’s driving this ad.

It turns out that only two of them are listed among the top 180 companies offering the most paid maternity leave to women, according to Fairygodboss, a women’s career advancement network. And those two companies are nowhere near the top of the list.

In other words, these companies are stingy. They aren’t supporting women; they’re protecting their bottom line.”

Read the entire opinion piece.

Penny Nance: Democratic candidates are really pro-abortion, not pro-choice

By | Feminist / Women's Issues, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Penny Nance penned the following opinion piece for FoxNews.com:

Remember these statements by Democrats seeking to become their party’s presidential nominee?

“I believe that reproductive rights are human rights, they are civil rights, and they are non-negotiable,” Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand of New York said in an interview with The Atlantic earlier this month.

“We must be vigilant in protecting a woman’s right to choose,” Sen. Cory Booker of New Jersey said on Twitter in January.

“… now more than ever, we must remain steadfast in our defense of a woman’s right to choose,” Rep. Tulsi Gabbard of Hawaii said in a statement on the 40th anniversary of the landmark 1973 Supreme Court Roe v. Wade decision the legalized abortion nationwide.

The Democratic presidential candidates want everyone to know they support abortion. They call this “choice” – which indicates a decision a woman makes about whether to have an abortion or have a baby. Many are now calling this choice a reproductive, human and civil right.

But not really.

Where were the Democratic presidential hopefuls when a British judge recently ruled that a mentally disabled woman in her 20s with the mental age of a child between ages 6 and 9 must undergo a forced abortion against her will and against her mother’s will? The judge cited the pregnant woman’s “best interests” and determined the pregnancy termination was “the best option.”

Click here to read the entire opinion piece.

Use Your Voice – Episode 12, Abortion and Eugenics

By | Legal, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

In this episode, Mario Diaz, Esq., Concerned Women for America’s (CWA) General Counsel, discusses a recent Supreme Court decision where Justice Clarence Thomas exposes the clear connection between abortion and eugenics. He said, “abortion is an act rife with the potential for eugenic manipulation.” The case is Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky and you won’t want to miss our discussion of its potential impact and what it means for the protection of the unborn.

For more on this case, read Mario’s op-ed “Clarence Thomas Speaks the Truth for SCOTUS on Abortion” as featured on American Thinker.

Top Faith Leaders Predict Evangelicals Will Show Up in Force for Trump in 2020

By | Family Issues, Feminist / Women's Issues, National Sovereignty, News and Events, Politics/National Sovereignty, Religious Issues, Religious Liberty, Sanctity of Life, Social / Cultural Issues | No Comments

CEO and President Penny Nance is featured in The Western Journal along with other top faith leaders such as Franklin Graham, Tony Perkins and Gary Bauer.

“Some of the nation’s top Christian leaders believe President Donald Trump will once again enjoy the strong backing of evangelicals in 2020, noting he now has a record, and not just promises, to run on.

The Western Journal spoke with Rev. Franklin Graham, Family Research Council president Tony Perkins, Concerned Women for America president Penny Nance, American Values president Gary Bauer and Christian Broadcasting Network chief political analyst David Brody to gauge their views on why Trump enjoyed such strong evangelical support in 2016, and how he looks with these voters going into the 2020 election.”

Read the entire article here:

Nutty attacks on pro-lifers by Sen. Gillbrand and CEOs may help make abortion a winning issue for Trump and GOP in 2020

By | Defense of Family, News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

There is a new level of hostility by the ruling class toward people in this nation, even women and minorities, who dare to believe in the intrinsic value of human life and thus identify as pro-life.

The left is losing the 46-year argument on the federalization of abortion laws, and it has made them angry and reckless.

They are now publicly equating our support for life to racism. It’s insidious and bigoted, but it’s also self-destructive.

On the political front, during an interview with the Des Moines Register “Gillibrand Compares Pro-Life Viewpoint to Racism, ‘Not Acceptable’, Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, D-N.Y., was clear in her racist allegations against pro-lifers on Tuesday.

Gillibrand said, “I think there’s some issues that have such moral clarity that we have as a society decided that the other side is not acceptable. Imagine saying that it’s okay to appoint a judge who’s racist or anti-Semitic or homophobic. Asking someone to appoint someone who takes away basic human rights of any group of people in America—I don’t think that those are political issues anymore.”

Click here to read the rest of this story as featured on FoxNews.com.

Billionaires Find New Ways to Push for Abortion on Demand

By | Blog, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Below are excerpts from a very interesting article by Dave Andrusko at National Right to Life. I commend it to you in its entirety. I think it is important for Concerned Women for America (CWA) members to realize what we are up against when it comes to protecting the sanctity of every human life at every level of public policy. Andrusko discusses the new ways certain billionaires are restructuring their donations in order to get around current IRS regulations and fund abortion on demand to an even bigger extent than they have before.

Even though the American people are against the abortion extremism we have seen in laws coming out New York, Virginia, and Illinois, these mega donors are committed to drowning out their voices by pouring in millions of dollars more in the name of “reproductive health.”

Over the years, pro-lifers have read story after story about billionaires pouring millions upon millions of their virtually limitless resources into advancing abortion both at home and abroad. Their favorite beneficiary is, of course, Planned Parenthood (and International Planned Parenthood) but there are many others.

The names are familiar and a who’s who of big time philanthropy. George Soros and his Open Society Institute (OPI); The Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation, named after Warren Buffett’s late wife; and the David and Lucille Packard Foundation, run by the heirs of one of the founders of printer manufacturer Hewlett Packard, to name just three heavyweights.

Another name that has cropped up with less attention paid to it is the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. A quick look back (thanks to the indispensable web.archive.org) we read this description: “Laura and John established the Laura and John Arnold Foundation in 2008. They believe philanthropy should be transformational and should seek through innovation to solve persistent problems in society.”

According to influencewatch.org, “The foundation focuses on criminal justice, education issues, public pensions, dietary policy, and scientific research reform.” But whatever other initiatives are funded, if you look at their giving (corporate and personal), you see bundles going to the usual pro-abortion suspects.

For example, under “personal advocacy and political contributions,” between December 2015 and December 2017, we find Planned Parenthood Action Fund [under the category $5,000,000 to $9,999,999] and “Planned Parenthood Texas Vote” [under the category $100,000 to $499,999].

Under “Charitable Contributions” for the same time period

  • Planned Parenthood Federation of America [$5,000,000 to $9,999,999]
  • Center for Reproductive Rights [$1,000,000-$4,999,999]
  • Guttmacher Institute [$1, 000,000-$4,999,999]
  • National Network of Abortion Funds [$50,000-$99,999]

Back to the Laura and John Arnold Foundation itself and recent major changes.

In January, writing at Inside Philanthropy, David Callahan observed “But those who closely follow the billionaire couple behind this operation know that they’ve long engaged in political giving alongside their foundation’s grantmaking. …Now, the Arnolds are bringing their philanthropy and political giving together in a new limited-liability corporation called Arnold Ventures. The goal is to create a more integrated push for impact on the wide range of public policy issues that have long animated the couple.”

When you go to the list of “public policy issues” at Arnold Ventures, you see “health,” which includes a link to a story headlined, “State lawmakers pass trio of reproductive-rights bills.”

In the first sentence, Jennifer Henderson writes about New York’s “Reproductive Health Act,” which she inaccurately describes are merely a law “to protect reproductive rights and abortion access even if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v. Wade.” As we have written dozens of times at NRL News Today, the RHA not only went miles beyond Roe v. Wade, it also eliminated the state’s protections for abortion survivors.

Callahan’s story—“When Philanthropy Is Not Enough: A Top Donor Couple Takes a Broader Approach to Impact” —is telling not only about the ambitions of the Arnolds but also other billionaires who eagerly fund abortion groups. He writes, “Some of today’s savviest mega-givers strategically blend philanthropic and political giving.” Callahan dubbed them “hybrid entities.”

Click here to read the rest of this article.

World’s tiniest surviving preemie shows abortion isn’t in line with science or common sense

By | News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

This week the nation’s imagination was captivated by a beautiful newborn baby girl called Saybie, who left the hospital weighing 5 pounds, 6 ounces. Doctors said she was born in December only 23 weeks into her mother’s pregnancy and was just about the size of an apple, weighing less than 9 ounces.

Her parents were told that Saybie – a name used by her care team – couldn’t survive. But Saybie’s parents didn’t give up hope. Modern medical science saved this tiny baby’s precious life and she is now thriving.

The San Diego hospital where she was born said Saybie is believed to be the world’s smallest surviving newborn, according to the Tiniest Babies Registry kept by the University of Iowa.

I and other pro-life Americans noted on Twitter and other platforms that Saybie is living proof that science is on the side of the pro-life cause. Her very survival must raise questions for our nation regarding current law on abortion…

Click here to read the rest of this story as featured on FoxNews.com.

Abortion at 20 Weeks Takes the Senate Stage

By | Blog, News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Since Roe v. Wade, technology has changed our understanding of preborn life, and we need to face the truth on this issue: unborn children do feel pain. Science and medicine have no issue acknowledging this. While some preborn children are administered anesthesia during necessary surgery in utero, others have their limbs ripped from their bodies in a late-term dismemberment abortion with no anesthesia or regard for suffering. Read More

Shame on Google for dissolving its AI council over African-American leader Kay Coles James

By | Blog, Defense of Family, News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Women across the political perspective applauded recently when Kay Coles James, the first woman and the first African-American to lead the conservative and respected Heritage Foundation, was chosen to join Google’s new external advisory council to in part discuss the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI).

Our joy lasted barely a week when, in reaction to internal pressure from incensed employees, she was ousted via the dissolution of the council.

As shocking as this may be, it is illustrative of the culture at Google, where over 1,000 Google employees took the time to sign a petition calling for James’ removal. Leaked email exchanges reported by Breitbart News show employees accused her of “transphobia” and “homophobia.” They accused her of viewing the LGBT community as “subhuman” and in support of “exterminationist” views.


Editor’s note: This article was published by Fox News. Click here to read it.

Saving Money Shouldn’t Mean Hurting Grandma

By | Blog, News and Events, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Concerned Women for America (CWA) has always fought to protect life from its beginning at conception until natural death. A recent hospital stay and subsequent medical care for my 80-year-old mother has served as a wakeup call to the particular vulnerability of the elderly.

With this top of mind while caring for her in Tennessee, I was struck and surprised when I learned via a TV ad about a new proposed government regulation which is particularly onerous for seniors. Read More

The House Makes Unprecedented Moves on Born Alive

By | Blog, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

On Tuesday, Minority Whip Steve Scalise (R-Louisiana) filed a discharge petition for H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. A discharge petition is a way to bring a bill to the floor that is otherwise being blocked by the Speaker, if the majority (218) of representatives agree and sign. On every legislative day since the bill’s introduction, Members have asked Speaker Pelosi for a vote on H.R. 962. This has now occurred 29 times.

On the first day, the discharge petition was ready for signatures, 193 representatives signed; this record-setting number is the most representatives to ever sign a discharge petition on the first day. On Wednesday, five additional members joined, bringing the tally to 198 signatures. We only need twenty more signatures to force Speaker Pelosi to put this bill on the floor for a vote. To find out if your representative has signed, please click here.

CWALAC joined representatives on Tuesday outside of the Capitol at a press conference in support of Born Alive and watched from the House gallery as members lined up to sign the discharge petition. We also attended the Virginia March for Life in Richmond on Wednesday, where many of the speakers highlighted the radical statements of Virginia Governor Northam (D) that sparked the Born Alive debate.

Born Alive is about stopping infanticide, not restricting or regulating abortion. We should all agree that once born, a newborn child is a patient and deserves protection. This is a reflection on our humanity. Recent polling shows that 82% of Americans, including 77% of pro-choice Americans, support protections for children born alive after an attempted abortion. This is not at all the radical bill the Democrats are portraying.

Please call your representative today and ask him/her to sign the discharge petition for H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivor’s Protection Act. Click here to make that call.

 

Has Your Representative Signed the Discharge Petition?

By | Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Representative Steve Scalise (R-LA) filed a discharge petition on H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. The Senate has voted on this bill, but Speaker Pelosi refuses to bring it to the House floor for a vote, even though House republicans have publicly asked almost thirty times.

A discharge petition is a special tool that can be used to get a bill on the floor for a vote, even if the Speaker, who controls the bills that are voted on and the House floor schedule, does not want a vote. A discharge petition needs 218 signatures from representatives, a majority of the House. Members are now able to sign this petition demanding a vote to protect babies born alive after failed abortions.

As of January 22, 2020, the following representatives HAVE signed the discharge petition to take up H.R. 962, the Born Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act. If you do not see your representative listed, please click here to contact them and ask them to sign the discharge petition!

 

                    205                                            13

        SIGNATURES TO DATE                    SIGNATURES NEEDED

 

Title

First Name

Last Name

Party

State-District

Rep.

Ralph Lee

Abraham

R

LA-05

Rep.

Robert

Aderholt

R

AL-04

Rep.

Rick

Allen

R

GA-12

Rep.

Justin

Amash

R

MI-03

Rep.

Mark

Amodei

R

NV-02

Rep.

Kelly

Armstrong

R

ND-At Large

Rep.

Jodey

Arrington

R

TX-19

Rep.

Brian

Babin

R

TX-36

Rep.

Don

Bacon

R

NE-02

Rep.

James

Baird

R

IN-04

Rep.

Troy

Balderson

R

OH-12

Rep.

Jim

Banks

R

IN-03

Rep.

Andy

Barr

R

KY-06

Rep.

Jack

Bergman

R

MI-01

Rep.

Andy

Biggs

R

AZ-05

Rep.

Gus

Bilirakis

R

FL-12

Rep.

Rob

Bishop

R

UT-01

Rep.

Dan

Bishop

R

NC-09

Rep.

Mike

Bost

R

IL-12

Rep.

Kevin

Brady

R

TX-08

Rep.

Mo

Brooks

R

AL-05

Rep.

Susan

Brooks

R

IN-05

Rep.

Vern

Buchanan

R

FL-16

Rep.

Ken

Buck

R

CO-04

Rep.

Larry

Bucshon

R

IN-08

Rep.

Ted

Budd

R

NC-13

Rep.

Tim

Burchett

R

TN-02

Rep.

Michael

Burgess

R

TX-26

Rep.

Bradley

Byrne

R

AL-01

Rep.

Ken

Calvert

R

CA-42

Rep.

Earl

Carter

R

GA-01

Rep.

John

Carter

R

TX-31

Rep.

Steve

Chabot

R

OH-01

Rep.

Liz

Cheney

R

WY-At Large

Rep.

Ben

Cline

R

VA-06

Rep.

Michael

Cloud

R

TX-27

Rep.

Tom

Cole

R

OK-04

Rep.

Chris

Collins

R

NY-27

Rep.

Doug

Collins

R

GA-09

Rep.

James

Comer

R

KY-01

Rep.

K.

Conaway

R

TX-11

Rep.

Paul

Cook

R

CA-08

Rep.

Eric

Crawford

R

AR-01

Rep.

Dan

Crenshaw

R

TX-02

Rep.

John

Curtis

R

UT-03

Rep.

Warren

Davidson

R

OH-08

Rep.

Rodney

Davis

R

IL-13

Rep.

Scott

DesJarlais

R

TN-04

Rep.

Mario

Diaz-Balart

R

FL-25

Rep.

Jeff

Duncan

R

SC-03

Rep.

Neal

Dunn

R

FL-02

Rep.

Tom

Emmer

R

MN-06

Rep.

Ron

Estes

R

KS-04

Rep.

A.

Ferguson IV

R

GA-03

Rep.

Brian

Fitzpatrick

R

PA-01

Rep.

Charles

Fleischmann

R

TN-03

Rep.

Bill

Flores

R

TX-17

Rep.

Jeff

Fortenberry

R

NE-01

Rep.

Virginia

Foxx

R

NC-05

Rep.

Russ

Fulcher

R

ID-01

Rep.

Matt

Gaetz

R

FL-01

Rep.

Mike

Gallagher

R

WI-08

Rep.

Mike

Garcia

R

CA-25

Rep.

Greg

Gianforte

R

MT-At Large

Rep.

Bob

Gibbs

R

OH-07

Rep.

Louie

Gohmert

R

TX-01

Rep.

Anthony

Gonzalez

R

OH-16

Rep.

Lance

Gooden

R

TX-05

Rep.

Paul

Gosar

R

AZ-04

Rep.

Kay

Granger

R

TX-12

Rep.

Garret

Graves

R

LA-06

Rep.

Tom

Graves

R

GA-14

Rep.

Sam

Graves

R

MO-06

Rep.

Mark

Green

R

TN-07

Rep.

H.

Griffith

R

VA-09

Rep.

Glenn

Grothman

R

WI-06

Rep.

Michael

Guest

R

MS-03

Rep.

Brett

Guthrie

R

KY-02

Rep.

Jim

Hagedorn

R

MN-01

Rep.

Andy

Harris

R

MD-01

Rep.

Vicky

Hartzler

R

MO-04

Rep.

Kevin

Hern

R

OK-01

Rep.

Jaime

Herrera Beutler

R

WA-03

Rep.

Jody

Hice

R

GA-10

Rep.

Clay

Higgins

R

LA-03

Rep.

J.

Hill

R

AR-02

Rep.

George

Holding

R

NC-02

Rep.

Trey

Hollingsworth

R

IN-09

Rep.

Richard

Hudson

R

NC-08

Rep.

Bill

Huizenga

R

MI-02

Rep.

Duncan

Hunter

R

CA-50

Rep.

Will

Hurd

R

TX-23

Rep.

Bill

Johnson

R

OH-06

Rep.

Dusty

Johnson

R

SD-At Large

Rep.

Mike

Johnson

R

LA-04

Rep.

Jim

Jordan

R

OH-04

Rep.

David

Joyce

R

OH-14

Rep.

John

Joyce

R

PA-13

Rep.

John

Katko

R

NY-24

Rep.

Fred

Keller

R

PA-12

Rep.

Mike

Kelly

R

PA-16

Rep.

Trent

Kelly

R

MS-01

Rep.

Steve

King

R

IA-04

Rep.

Peter T.

King

R

NY-02

Rep.

Adam

Kinzinger

R

IL-16

Rep.

David

Kustoff

R

TN-08

Rep.

Darin

LaHood

R

IL-18

Rep.

Doug

LaMalfa

R

CA-01

Rep.

Doug

Lamborn

R

CO-05

Rep.

Robert

Latta

R

OH-05

Rep.

Debbie

Lesko

R

AZ-08

Rep.

Daniel

Lipinski

D

IL-03

Rep.

Billy

Long

R

MO-07

Rep.

Barry

Loudermilk

R

GA-11

Rep.

Frank

Lucas

R

OK-03

Rep.

Blaine

Luetkemeyer

R

MO-03

Rep.

Kenny

Marchant

R

TX-24

Rep.

Roger

Marshall

R

KS-01

Rep.

Thomas

Massie

R

KY-04

Rep.

Brian

Mast

R

FL-18

Rep.

Ben

McAdams

D

UT-04

Rep.

Kevin

McCarthy

R

CA-23

Rep.

Michael

McCaul

R

TX-10

Rep.

Tom

McClintock

R

CA-04

Rep.

Patrick

McHenry

R

NC-10

Rep.

David

McKinley

R

WV-01

Rep.

Mark

Meadows

R

NC-11

Rep.

Daniel

Meuser

R

PA-09

Rep.

Carol

Miller

R

WV-03

Rep.

Paul

Mitchell

R

MI-10

Rep.

John

Moolenaar

R

MI-04

Rep.

Alexander

Mooney

R

WV-02

Rep.

Markwayne

Mullin

R

OK-02

Rep.

Gregory

Murphy

R

NC-03

Rep.

Dan

Newhouse

R

WA-04

Rep.

Ralph

Norman

R

SC-05

Rep.

Devin

Nunes

R

CA-22

Rep.

Pete

Olson

R

TX-22

Rep.

Steven

Palazzo

R

MS-04

Rep.

Gary

Palmer

R

AL-06

Rep.

Greg

Pence

R

IN-06

Rep.

Scott

Perry

R

PA-10

Rep.

Collin C.

Peterson

D

MN-07

Rep.

Bill

Posey

R

FL-08

Rep.

John

Ratcliffe

R

TX-04

Rep.

Tom

Reed

R

NY-23

Rep.

Guy

Reschenthaler

R

PA-14

Rep.

Tom

Rice

R

SC-07

Rep.

Denver

Riggleman

R

VA-05

Rep.

Martha

Roby

R

AL-02

Rep.

Cathy

Rodgers

R

WA-05

Rep.

David

Roe

R

TN-01

Rep.

Harold

Rogers

R

KY-05

Rep.

Mike

Rogers

R

AL-03

Rep.

Francis

Rooney

R

FL-19

Rep.

John

Rose

R

TN-06

Rep.

David

Rouzer

R

NC-07

Rep.

Chip

Roy

R

TX-21

Rep.

John H.

Rutherford

R

FL-04

Rep.

Steve

Scalise

R

LA-01

Rep.

David

Schweikert

R

AZ-06

Rep.

Austin

Scott

R

GA-08

Rep.

F.

Sensenbrenner, Jr.

R

WI-05

Rep.

John

Shimkus

R

IL-15

Rep.

Michael

Simpson

R

ID-02

Rep.

Adrian

Smith

R

NE-03

Rep.

Christopher

Smith

R

NJ-04

Rep.

Jason

Smith

R

MO-08

Rep.

Lloyd

Smucker

R

PA-11

Rep.

Ross

Spano

R

FL-15

Rep.

Pete

Stauber

R

MN-08

Rep.

Elise

Stefanik

R

NY-21

Rep.

Bryan

Steil

R

WI-01

Rep.

W.

Steube

R

FL-17

Rep.

Chris

Stewart

R

UT-02

Rep.

Steve

Stivers

R

OH-15

Rep.

Van

Taylor

R

TX-03

Rep.

Glenn

Thompson

R

PA-15

Rep.

Mac

Thornberry

R

TX-13

Rep.

Tom

Tiffany

R

WI-07

Rep.

William

Timmons IV

R

SC-04

Rep.

Scott

Tipton

R

CO-03

Rep.

Michael

Turner

R

OH-10

Rep.

Fred

Upton

R

MI-06

Rep.

Jefferson

Van Drew

R

NJ-02

Rep.

Ann

Wagner

R

MO-02

Rep.

Tim

Walberg

R

MI-07

Rep.

Greg

Walden

R

OR-02

Rep.

Mark

Walker

R

NC-06

Rep.

Jackie

Walorski

R

IN-02

Rep.

Michael

Waltz

R

FL-06

Rep.

Steven

Watkins, Jr.

R

KS-02

Rep.

Randy

Weber, Sr.

R

TX-14

Rep.

Daniel

Webster

R

FL-11

Rep.

Brad

Wenstrup

R

OH-02

Rep.

Bruce

Westerman

R

AR-04

Rep.

Roger

Williams

R

TX-25

Rep.

Joe

Wilson

R

SC-02

Rep.

Robert

Wittman

R

VA-01

Rep.

Steve

Womack

R

AR-03

Rep.

Rob

Woodall

R

GA-07

Rep.

Ron

Wright

R

TX-06

Rep.

Ted

Yoho

R

FL-03

Rep.

Don

Young

R

AK-At Large

Rep.

Lee

Zeldin

R

NY-01

 

 

Abortion is Not an International Right

By | Blog, International, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Sanctity of Life, United Nations | No Comments

The Commission on the Status of Women (CSW 63) came to an end this week at the United Nations in New York City. News reports warn that the U.S. seeks to decrease the rights of women and girls by taking away an international “right” to abortion in UN resolutions. Based mainly on propaganda from far-left political interest groups, this information is inaccurate and misleading.

The U.S. has long been a leader in policies and aid supporting the expansion of women’s rights around the world. Under the Trump administration alone, major initiatives have been launched in three sectors where the advancement of female equality is sorely needed increasing economic empowerment and entrepreneurship, increasing diplomatic and security participation and decreasing the technological or “digital divide” of women and girls. Research shows that women and girls face inequalities in all of these areas and initiatives like this can elevate women by targeting the main challenges they face. In addition, these initiatives reflect the strategic objectives of gender empowerment goals.

In contrast, the promotion of a so-called “right to abortion” that dominates liberal narratives at the UN does none of these. … [Read More Online at The Hill]

Secretary Pompeo Continues to Remove U.S. Taxpayer Funds Used for Abortion Overseas

By | Blog, International, News and Events, Planned Parenthood, Press Releases, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

Today, Secretary of State Mike Pompeo announced further implementation of the Mexico City Policy to protect “more unborn babies around the world than ever before” and enforce President Trump’s commitment to stop U.S. taxpayers from funding abortion overseas.

In January 2017, President Trump’s executive action restored and extended the original 1984 Mexico City Policy to prohibit any organization which promotes or performs abortions in other countries from receiving U.S. global health funds. Today, Sec. Pompeo announced that the U.S. will also no longer fund organizations who subcontract with or provide financial assistance to other organizations in the global abortion industry. In addition, he announced the State Department will enforce the Siljander amendment to the 1982 Foreign Assistance and Related Programs Appropriations Act which prohibits tax dollars from being used to lobby for or against abortion. This announcement will directly reduce funding to the Organization of American States (OAS) in proportion to its expenditures on abortion-related activities.

Penny Nance, President and CEO of Concerned Women for America, and Dr. Shea Garrison, Vice President of International Affairs for CWA, responded to Sec. Pompeo’s announcement:

“Secretary Pompeo’s announcement confirms the proud pro-life stance of this administration and their commitment to ensuring that U.S. taxpayer dollars are not used to promote or subsidize the killing of unborn children around the world. Today’s announcement closes two gaping backdoor loopholes that organizations continue to use to get around the funding limitations of President Trump’s expansion of the Mexico City Policy.
“The U.S. has shown we can continue to meet the most critical health care needs for women while refusing to pay for the killing of unborn babies. This is consistent with the moral beliefs of most governments around the world and strengthens U.S.-foreign relations. In addition, women’s rights and health care can be better served through more focused assistance to alleviate the main challenges women face around the world — including in maternal health and mortality.
“We are thankful for Sec. Pompeo’s continued actions to implement the administration’s pro-life policies to the broadest extent possible. As Sec. Pompeo said: ‘This is a policy that is designed fundamentally to protect human beings … this is decent, this is right.’ We are proud to stand behind an administration that protects the most vulnerable among us.”

Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee is the legislative arm of Concerned Women for America, the nation’s largest public policy women’s organization with members across the country, over 450 Prayer/Action Chapters and Home Teams, 600 trained leaders, and over 30 years of service to our nation. For more information visit www.concernedwomen.org