Religious Liberty

No Christians Allowed: A New Kind of Religious Test for Public Office

By | Blog, News and Events, Religious Liberty | No Comments

For six days, Kim Davis sat in jail because, to put it most simply, it had been found that you can’t be a practicing Christian and serve the public office of county clerk.

But for Kim Davis, and any genuine Christian, Christianity CAN’T be taken entirely out of a job; it is a whole identity. Freedom of religion is not just “freedom to worship” on Sundays, but freedom to live under Christ the King all day every day.  Gays are protected for their beliefs, and Christianity persecuted for theirs.  Gays claim gayness as their whole identity, but won’t let Christians claim Christ as theirs.  There would be a righteous outcry if a gay man was barred from public office or jailed for being gay.  What if there was a government task, like issuing a permit for a Westboro Baptist Church protest, in which the gay official was forced to participate?  This would be grave injustice! Any nation that prioritizes a belief to the point of prosecuting, instead of protecting opposing beliefs, it has fallen far from the ideal of freedom.

The founders were no stranger to religious dispute and the question of the relationship between faith and public office. They disagreed adamantly amongst themselves on many religious questions.  Deep-seated differences between Catholics, Anglicans, Protestants, Quakers, Mennonites and more drove wedges into the founding of the nation that took great tolerance to overcome. To protect the interest of all parties of many religious persuasions, the founders made it unconstitutional to require any certain religious belief of a public official: “… no religious test shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States.” (Article VI, Paragraph 3)

This policy was intended not to make everyone who served in government irreligious, but rather to make all religions welcome in government. The clause’s principle of tolerance for diversity of belief is a better argument for getting government out of the marriage question entirely (and leaving everyone’s belief to themselves), which is exactly what this clerk has chosen to do, then it is to force her to do something against her religion.  The idea that Kim can’t be a Christian to do her job amounts to nothing less than a twisted type of religious test that ensures that Christianity isn’t present.

Testing to see if you don’t have cancer is a cancer test.

Testing to see if water doesn’t have chemicals is a chemical test.

Testing for the lack of something is the same process as testing for it.

Testing to ensure you aren’t going to follow your religion in public office is a religious test.

The policy meant that the lack or presence of any religion should not be the determining factor of public office, but has been ignored on both extremes. In times past, it was atheists who fought for their rights to serve in public office because of the promise of no religious test.  In the Supreme Court case Torcaso V. Watkins, public notary Roy Torcaso of Maryland won his appeal to the Supreme Court that his atheism could not preclude him from public office. Now America faces the other extreme.  Now it is Christians who must fight for their rights to serve in public office even though they remain religious.

Compromise would be easy, but it wouldn’t accomplish what the gay couples want.  They want our thundering applause, which we will not grant.  Neither these gay couples nor our government have the authority to test our faith and to limit our freedoms.  Instead we will face the ultimate test of answering to God for our faithfulness, and “We must obey God, rather than man.” (Acts 5:29)  Kim’s decision to do just that is what got her thrown into jail.  It’s almost like we are in ancient Rome and not America.


Silly Season, Serious Matters

By | Blog, National Sovereignty, News and Events, Religious Liberty | No Comments

kmuellerThere is a reason people call election time, “the silly season.”  It seems this year to have come early.   Over the top rants are getting a yawn but obvious opposition research gets treated as real.  The recent attack on Carly Fiorina I put in the latter category.   It seems that some of my friends who I respect are misinterpreting a speech she gave a few weeks after 9/11 about leadership.  The last portion of that speech recounts some history of accomplishments of the ancient Ottoman Empire as examples of leadership.  This has been grossly miscast by some people as her somehow being supportive of radical Islam or terrorism.

This is complete nonsense.   I think we should all agree this elongated “silly season” to carefully consider the entire record of the candidate we are discussing before we make a harsh pronouncement on their motives.  There are plenty of people who blatantly and emphatically deny the threat of Sharia law and radical Islam without us looking for boogey men or women who don’t exist.

We have too much at stake to play this game.

This past week’s revelations regarding the rape and torture of twenty six year-old American citizen and  aid worker Kayla Mueller and her probable murder at the hands of ISIS leader Abu Bakra Al Baghdadi should be a wake-up call to the American people.  I haven’t the words to express my disgust at this report.  Yes, I have written extensively and been broken-hearted at the vile treatment of the young Yazidi women.  The revelations on the treatment of Kayla, however, took me to a new level of outrage.  She was a U.S. citizen and innocent humanitarian worker.  Her rape, torture and murder were a direct attack on the United States.  Nothing less.

We must demand justice for her death.  And I am just going to say it.  I want Al Baghdadi dead and in hell where he belongs.  Too tough?  Well, too bad.  Radical Islam must be stopped.  They are the new Evil Empire.

We must also concentrate our rightly felt fury in the proper direction, and that is this feckless Administration who refuses to even call this particular evil by its proper name:  Radical Islamic Terrorism.  I’ve had it!  The Presidential candidate that gets my support will be the one who convinces me that these evil men (and apparently some women) will pay a price.  If Al Baghdadi isn’t already dead via our air strikes, we should finish the job and his cohorts in crime along with him. That level of evil should not be tolerated. I want to see the plan that does that.  Measured words have their place but the treatment of Kayla Mueller deserves our outrage and from me she has it!

Prime Time Debate Let Down

By | News and Events, Religious Liberty, Sanctity of Life | No Comments

No Planned Parenthood question.  Need I say more?  One of the most gruesome, shocking, hot topics of the day – a human rights crisis, and the prime time hosts decide not to bring it up.  Instead they decided to go to the left’s talking points, asking about rape, incest or health of the mother on the issue of abortion.

Here is how Gov. Scott Walker responded:primetimedebate

WALKER: Well, I’m pro-life, I’ve always been pro-life, and I’ve got a position that I think is consistent with many Americans out there in that in that I believe that that is an unborn child that’s in need of protection out there, and I’ve said many a time that that unborn child can be protected, and there are many other alternatives that can also protect the life of that mother. That’s been consistently proven.

Unlike Hillary Clinton, who has a radical position in terms of support for Planned Parenthood, I defunded Planned Parenthood more than four years ago, long before any of these videos came out.

I’ve got a position that’s in line with everyday America.

On same-sex “marriage” also, Gov. Mike Huckabee had to correct the bizarre framing of the question:

HUCKABEE: Chris, I disagree with the idea that the real issue is a constitutional amendment. That’s a long and difficult process. I’ve actually taken the position that’s bolder than that.

A lot of people are talking about defunding planned parenthood, as if that’s a huge game changer. I think it’s time to do something even more bold. I think the next president ought to invoke the Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the constitution now that we clearly know that that baby inside the mother’s womb is a person at the moment of conception.

The reason we know that it is is because of the DNA schedule that we now have clear scientific evidence on. And, this notion that we just continue to ignore the personhood of the individual is a violation of that unborn child’s Fifth and 14th Amendment rights for due process and equal protection under the law.

It’s time that we recognize the Supreme Court is not the supreme being, and we change the policy to be pro-life and protect children instead of rip up their body parts and sell them like they’re parts to a Buick.

Then, there was the God question.  There are no words to describe it, so here it is: “I want to know if any of them have received a word from God on what they should do and take care of first.”  The candidates tried to do what they could with it.  Here is how Senator Ted Cruz responded:

CRUZ: Well, I am blessed to receive a word from God every day in receiving the scriptures and reading the scriptures. And God speaks through the Bible.

I’m the son of a pastor and evangelist and I’ve described many times how my father, when I was a child, was an alcoholic. He was not a Christian. And my father left my mother and left me when I was just three years old.

And someone invited him to Clay Road Baptist Church. And he gave his heart to Jesus and it turned him around. And he got on a plane and he flew back to my mother and me.

I would also note that the scripture tells us, “you shall know them by their fruit.” We see lots of “campaign conservatives.” But if we’re going to win in 2016, we need a consistent conservative, someone who has been a fiscal conservative, a social conservative, a national security conservative.

There are real differences among the candidates on issues like amnesty, like Obamacare, like religious liberty, like life and marriage. And I have been proud to fight and stand for religious liberty, to stand against Planned Parenthood, to defend life for my entire career.

And I will be proud to continue to do so as president of the United States.

The question was amended a bit later, maybe after the hosts notice the awkwardness:

MODERATOR: Senator Rubio, I want to ask you the same question. But I do want to mention, a woman just came here to the stage and asked, what about the veterans? I want to hear more about what these candidates are going to do for our nation’s veterans.

So I put the question to you about God and the veterans, which you may find to be related.

RUBIO: Well, first, let me say I think God has blessed us. He has blessed the Republican Party with some very good candidates. The Democrats can’t even find one.

And I believe God has blessed our country. This country has been extraordinarily blessed. And we have honored that blessing. And that’s why God has continued to bless us.

And he has blessed us with young men and women willing to risk their lives and sometimes die in uniform for the safety and security of our people.

Unfortunately today we have a VA that does not do enough for them. I am proud that last year we helped change the law. We changed the law to give the power to the VA secretary the ability to fire any executive that isn’t doing their job.

And it is outrageous they’ve only fired one person to date. When I’m president of the United States, we’re going to have a VA that cares more about our veterans than about the bureaucrats who work at the VA.

The biggest laugh of the night goes to Gov. Mike Huckabee who said this in closing:

HUCKABEE: It seems like this election has been a whole lot about a person who’s very high in the polls, that doesn’t have a clue about how to govern.

A person who has been filled with scandals, and who could not lead, and, of course, I’m talking about Hillary Clinton.

He got a big laugh from everyone.  And concluded strongly:

I think America is in trouble, but it’s not beyond repair. But it’s going to take leadership who sees the greatness of this country, and who believes that once again we can be one nation, under God.

I’ll be my best to do that, and thank you for your support.

Finally, in conclusion Ted Cruz had to force many of the issues we would have love to hear more about, like the defunding of Planned Parenthood:

CRUZ: If I’m elected president, let me tell you about my first day in office. The first thing I intend to do is to rescind every illegal and unconstitutional executive action taken by Barack Obama.

The next thing I intend to do is instruct the Department of Justice to open an investigation into these videos and to prosecute Planned Parenthood for any criminal violations.

The next thing I intend to do is instruct the Department of Justice and the IRS to stop persecuting religious liberty, and then intend to cancel the Iran deal, and finally move the U.S. embassy in Israel to Jerusalem.

I will keep my word. My father fled Cuba, and I will fight to defend liberty because my family knows what it’s like to lose it.

Wish we’d had more of that, as we did in the first debate earlier.

Read more posts like this on the Legal Blurb Blog on CWA’s Legal Studies Page.

Follow Mario on Twitter @legalblurbblog

Be sure to check out Mario’s first book, “Be Spent: Winning the Fight for Freedom’s Survival,” schedule for release this Fall.

Administration Leaving Americans Behind in Final Iran Deal?

By | News and Events, Press Releases, Religious Liberty | No Comments

Washington, D.C. – A final deal with Iran regarding its nuclear program could be announced at any moment. Will Pastor Saeed and the other Americans imprisoned in Iran be left behind?

Penny Nance, CEO and President of Concerned Women for America Legislative Action Committee (CWALAC), the nation’s largest public policy women’s organization, had this to say:

“As the Obama Administration discusses the details of a nuclear agreement with Iran, there are multiple requirements that need to be included. Apart from specific elements that address Iran’s pathway to a nuclear weapon, one component that should be adamantly sought, is the return of American Pastor Saeed Abedini and the other Americans imprisoned in Iran.

“The current negotiations are the best option America has to diplomatically urge the release of our citizens. Even though President Obama has mentioned Pastor Saeed in the negotiation process, their release must be a priority.

“Thankfully, this Executive agreement will be submitted to Congress for review. From reports made, it will likely be a hard sell. Constituents must remember key components, like the release of those wrongfully imprisoned, when they address their Members of Congress. If the Administration leaves Americans behind to gain a deal with a country that is a state sponsor of terrorism and violates human rights, then they should feel the repercussions here at home.

“Those repercussions include Democrats and Republicans holding the line on a resolution of disapproval, outlined in the Iran Nuclear Agreement Review Act.”


For an interview with Penny Nance, please contact Janae Stracke at or 712-269-1724.

The Bitter Irony of the Day of Silence

By | Defense of Family, Hawaii, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, News and Events, North Carolina, Religious Liberty, South Dakota, Virginia, Wisconsin | No Comments

What if I told you that pro-lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and questioning (LGBTQ) activists are working tirelessly to infiltrate schools and influence children across the country? What if I said activists were taunting and bullying kids in public school and shaming them regarding their religious beliefs that favor traditional marriage? Read More